ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Although Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) extra-articular manifestations (ExtRA) occurrence has been decreasing over time, they are still a major mortality risk factor for patients. Objective To determine the prevalence of ExtRA in a large cohort, and its association with demographic and clinical variables. Method Cross-sectional and observational study, based on a multi-centric database from a prospective cohort, in which 11 public rheumatology centres enrolled RA patients (1987 ARA or 2010 ACR-EULAR). Data collection began in 08-2015, using a single online electronic medical record. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whit-ney U-test, and Fisher's exact test or chi-square test, as appropriate, were used for categorical variables. The level of significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05). Results 1115 patients were included: 89% women, age [mean ± SD] 58.2 ± 11.5 years, disease duration 14.5 ± 12.2 years, positive Rheumatoid Factor (RF, n = 1108) in 77%, positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA, n = 477) in 78%. Regarding ExtRA, 334 occurrences were registered in 261 patients, resulting in an overall prevalence of 23.4% in the cohort. The comparison among ExtRA and Non-ExtRA groups shows significant higher age (p < 0.001), disease duration (p < 0.001), RF high titers (p = 0.018), Clinical Disease Activity index (CDAI) (p < 0.001), Disease Activity Index 28 (DAS 28) (p < 0.001), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (p < 0.001) in ExtRA group. Treatment with Azathioprine (p = 0.002), Etanercept (p = 0.049) Glucocorticoids (GC) ('p = 0.002), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (p < 0.001) were more frequent in ExtRA group. Conclusions ExtRA manifestations still show an expressive occurrence that should not be underestimated. Our findings reinforce that long-term seropositive disease, associated with significant disability and persistent inflammatory activity are the key factors related to ExtRA development.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: A incorporação dos imunobiológicos para tratamento da artrite reumatoide (AR) no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) representou um avanço significativo, porém teve um impacto importante no orçamento. Como o modelo vigente de dispensação direta ao paciente apresentava deficiências, implementou-se o modelo do CEDMAC de terapia assistida com foco no uso racional, visando minimizar despesas e potencializar o alcance. Entretanto, não há dados que comparem os dois modelos. Assim, esse estudo objetivou comparar o número de frascos efetivamente dispensados pelo modelo do CEDMAC à dispensação direta e avaliar seu impacto financeiro. Métodos: Foram incluídos atendimentos de pacientes com AR no CEDMAC em 2015, cujo imunobiológico foi fornecido pelo Ministério da Saúde. Foram registrados medicamento e dose recebidos, dose prescrita, número de frascos, cancelamentos por contraindicação e faltas. Como comparação, foi estimado o número de frascos que seriam entregues pela dispensação direta. Calculou-se a diferença entre o número total de frascos dispensados pelos dois sistemas e o impacto financeiro pelo valor de aquisição em 2015. Resultados: Em 2015, o CEDMAC realizou 3.784 atendimentos para pacientes com AR. O total de frascos de imunobiológicos prescritos foi de 10.000 frascos e 1.946 (19,5%) não foram utilizados por otimização de frascos, contraindicações ou absenteísmo. Os frascos não utilizados reduziram as despesas em R$ 806.132,62. A expansão do modelo para todo SUS reduziria as despesas em R$ 121.110.388,27. Conclusão: O modelo de terapia assistida do CEDMAC reduz consideravelmente o volume de frascos dispensados e pode trazer uma relevante redução de despesas no fornecimento dos imunobiológicos para AR no SUS.
Objective: The incorporation of immunobiologicals for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) represented a significant advance but had an important impact on the budget. As the current model of direct delivery to the patient presented deficiencies, the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy focusing on rational use was implemented to minimize expenses and increase access. However, there is no data comparing the two models. Thus, this study aimed to compare the number of vials effectively dispensed by the CEDMAC model compared to direct delivery and to evaluate its financial impact. Methods: We included RA patients attended at CEDMAC during 2015, whose immunobiological was provided by Ministry of Health. Drug and dose received, prescribed dose, number of vials, cancellations due to contraindication and absences were recorded. As comparison, the number of vials that would be delivered by the direct delivery model were estimated. Savings were calculated by the difference between the total number of vials dispensed by the two systems and the financial impact by acquisition value in 2015. Results: During 2015, CEDMAC performed 3,784 consultations for RA patients. The total number of immunobiological vials prescribed was 10,000 vials and 1,946 (19.5%) were not used for vial optimization, contraindications or absenteeism. Saved vials reduced expenses by R$ 806,132.62. The expansion of the model for all SUS would reduce expenses by R$ 121,110,388.27. Conclusion: CEDMAC's model of assisted therapy considerably reduces the volume of dispensed vials and can bring significant cost offsets in the supply of RA immunobiologicals by SUS.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Utilization , Health Care Economics and OrganizationsABSTRACT
Objective: The incorporation of immunobiological agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment at the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) represented a significant advance but had an important impact on the budget. As the current model of direct patient delivery had deficiencies, the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy was implemented to focus on rational use to minimize expenses and increase access. However, there is no data to compare the two models. Thus, this study aimed to compare the number of bottles effectively dispensed by the CEDMAC model to direct dispensing and assess its financial impact. Methods: Care of RA patients at CEDMAC in 2015, whose immunobiological drugs were provided by the Ministry of Health, were included. Drug and dose received, prescribed dose, the number of bottles, cancellations due to contraindication, and absences were recorded. As a comparison, the number of bottles that would be delivered by direct dispensing was estimated. The difference between the total number of bottles dispensed by the two systems and the financial impact of the purchase price in 2015 was calculated. Results: In 2015, CEDMAC provided 3,784 consultations for RA patients. The total number of bottles of immunobiological agents prescribed was 10,000 bottles, and 1,946 (19.5%) were not used for bottle optimization, contraindications, or absenteeism. Unused bottles reduced expenses by R$ 806,132.62. The expansion of the model to the entire SUS would reduce costs by R$ 121,110,388.27. Conclusion: The CEDMAC assisted therapy model considerably reduces the volume of dispensed bottles and can significantly reduce expenses in the supply of immunobiological agents for RA at SUS.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Objectives This analysis describes the protocol of a study with a case-cohort to design to prospectively evaluate the incidence of subclinical atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) in Chronic Inflammatory Disease (CID) participants compared to non-diseased ones. Methods A high-risk group for CID was defined based on data collected in all visits on self-reported medical diagnosis, use of medicines, and levels of high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein >10 mg/L. The comparison group is the Aleatory Cohort Sample (ACS): a group with 10% of participants selected at baseline who represent the entire cohort. In both groups, specific biomarkers for DIC, markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, and CVD morbimortality will be tested using weighted Cox. Results The high-risk group (n = 2,949; aged 53.6 ± 9.2; 65.5% women) and the ACS (n=1543; 52.2±8.8; 54.1% women) were identified. Beyond being older and mostly women, participants in the high-risk group present low average income (29.1% vs. 24.8%, p < 0.0001), higher BMI (Kg/m2) (28.1 vs. 26.9, p < 0.0001), higher waist circumference (cm) (93.3 vs. 91, p < 0.0001), higher frequencies of hypertension (40.2% vs. 34.5%, p < 0.0001), diabetes (20.7% vs. 17%, p = 0.003) depression (5.8% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.007) and higher levels of GlycA a new inflammatory marker (p < 0.0001) compared to the ACS. Conclusions The high-risk group selected mostly women, older, lower-income/education, higher BMI, waist circumference, and of hypertension, diabetes, depression, and higher levels of GlycA when compared to the ACS. The strategy chosen to define the high-risk group seems adequate given that multiple sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are compatible with CID.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the frequency of anti-collagen type V in humans with early systemic sclerosis (SSc) compared to defined SSc patients and healthy controls, since collagen type V was shown to be overexpressed in early SSc patients' skin and there is no data concerning the presence of this antibody in early stages of human SSc. Experimental studies showed that animal models immunized with collagen type V developed a disease similar to human systemic sclerosis (SSc), with antibodies production, mainly in early stages post-immunization. Methods: Eighty-one female SSc patients were included and divided into two groups: early-SSc (18 patients-EULAR Preliminary Criteria) and defined-SSc (63 patients-ACR Criteria 1980). The control group consisted of 19 healthy women age-matched to Early-SSc group. Anti-collagen type V was performed by ELISA. Data was analyzed by appropriate tests. Results: The prevalence of anti-collagen type V in early-SSc, defined-SSc and control groups was respectively 33, 17 and 5% (p = 0.07). SSc patients with anti-collagen type V had shorter disease duration compared to those without this antibody (8.8 ± 5.1 vs. 14.7 ± 8.9, p = 0.006). Likewise, early-SSc patients with anti-collagen V also had a shorter disease duration than patients negative for this antibody (4.6 ± 2.2 vs. 9.7 ± 5.2, p = 0.04). No association with clinical subsets or scleroderma antibodies specificities was observed (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The production of anti-collagen type V in SSc seems to be an early event independent of other antibodies specificities. Further studies are necessary to determine if the underlying mechanism for this chronology involves a primary immune response to abnormal expression of collagen type V.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology , Collagen Type V/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/instrumentation , BiomarkersABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Immunosuppressed patients are at risk of microsporidiosis, and this parasitosis has an increased rate of dissemination in this population. Our objective was to evaluate the presence of microsporidiosis and other intestinal parasites in rheumatic disease patients undergoing anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients (47 with rheumatoid arthritis, 31 with ankylosing spondylitis and 11 with psoriatic arthritis) and 92 healthy control patients were enrolled in the study. Three stool samples and cultures were collected from each subject. RESULTS: The frequency of microsporidia was significantly higher in rheumatic disease patients than in control subjects (36 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001), as well as in those with rheumatic diseases (32 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001), ankylosing spondylitis (45 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001) and psoriatic arthritis (40 vs. 4 percent, respectively; p<0.0001), despite a similar social-economic class distribution in both the patient and control groups (p = 0.1153). Of note, concomitant fecal leukocytes were observed in the majority of the microsporidia-positive patients (79.5 percent). Approximately 80 percent of the patients had gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea (26 percent), abdominal pain (31 percent) and weight loss (5 percent), although the frequencies of these symptoms were comparable in patients with and without this infection (p>0.05). Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis disease activity parameters were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). The duration of anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and glucocorticoid use were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: We have documented that microsporidiosis with intestinal mucosa disruption is frequent in patients undergoing concomitant anti-tumor necrosis factor/disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug therapy. Impaired host defenses due to the combination of the underlying disease and the immunosuppressive therapy is the most likely explanation for this finding, and this increased susceptibility reinforces the need for the investigation of microsporidia and implementation of treatment strategies in this population.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Intestinal Diseases/microbiology , Microsporidiosis/immunology , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Case-Control Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Socioeconomic Factors , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A terapia imunobiológica anti-TNFα tem-se mostrado efetiva no tratamento de pacientes com artrite psoriásica (APs) refratária. No entanto, não está bem definido o risco de desenvolvimento de autoanticorpos comumente encontrados nas doenças reumatológicas em pacientes com APs na vigência desse tratamento. OBJETIVO: avaliar a indução de autoanticorpos específicos durante a terapia anti-TNFα em pacientes com APs. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Foram analisadas amostras de soro de 23 pacientes com APs (mulheres: 61 por cento, idade: 45,04 ± 12,68 anos, quadro poliarticular: 69,6 por cento, duração da doença: 13,3 ± 7,7 anos, infliximabe: 82,60 por cento) obtidas imediatamente antes (basal) e cerca de um ano após a introdução da terapia anti-TNF (última amostra) (385 ± 131,45 dias). A pesquisa incluiu a detecção de anticorpos antinucleares (ANA) e anticorpos para dsDNA (imunofluorescência indireta em células Hep-2 e em Crithidia luciliae, respectivamente); RNP e Sm (hemaglutinação passiva); Ro/SS-A e/ou La/SS-B, cromatina, histona, peptídeo citrulinado (CCP) e cardiolipina (ELISA). RESULTADOS: A pesquisa basal de ANA revelou positividade em 47,8 por cento dos pacientes, com predomínio do padrão nuclear homogêneo (81,8 por cento). Todas as amostras de soro testadas foram negativas para fator reumatoide e anticorpos anticardiolipina, RNP, Sm, Ro/SS-A, La/SS-B, histona e dsDNA, enquanto dois pacientes apresentaram positividade para anticromatina e um para anti-CCP. Todas as amostras de ANA positivas no tempo basal, exceto uma, mantiveram essa reatividade após a introdução da terapia anti-TNF. Reatividade "de novo" ANA foi observada em quatro dos pacientes originalmente negativos (33,3 por cento). Anticorpos anti-Ro/SS-A, La/SS-B, cardiolipina, histona, dsDNA e fator reumatoide foram sistematicamente negativos em todas as amostras finais de soro testadas e positividade anticromatina foi detectada em outros três...
INTRODUCTION: Anti-TNFα therapy has been effective in the treatment of patients with refractory psoriatic arthritis (PSA). However, the risk of developing autoantibodies commonly found in rheumatic diseases in PSA patients undergoing this therapy is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the induction of specific autoantibodies after anti-TNFα therapy in PSA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum samples from 23 PSA patients (women: 61 percent, age: 45.04 ± 12.68 years, polyarticular: 69.6 percent, disease duration: 13.3 ± 7.7 years, infliximab: 82.60 percent) obtained immediately before (baseline) and approximately one year after the introduction of anti-TNF therapy (last sample) (385 ± 131.45 days), were analyzed. The analysis included detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (indirect immunofluorescence on Hep-2 cells and Crithidia luciliae, respectively); anti-RNP and anti-Sm (passive hemagglutination); and anti-Ro/ SS-A and/or anti-La/SS-B, anti-chromatin, anti-histones, anti-citrullinated peptide (CCP), and anti-cardiolipin (ELISA) antibodies. RESULTS: At baseline, ANA was positive in 47.8 percent of patients, with predominance of homogeneous nuclear pattern (81.8 percent). All baseline serum samples were negative for rheumatoid factor and antibodies to cardiolipin, RNP, Sm, Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, anti-histone, and anti-dsDNA antibodies, while two patients were positive for anti-chromatin and one for anti-CCP. All ANA-positive samples at baseline, except for one, remained positive after the introduction of anti-TNF therapy; however, de novo ANA reactivity was observed in four originally negative patients (33.3 percent). Anti-Ro/SS-A, La/SS-B, cardiolipin, histones, dsDNA, and rheumatoid factor antibodies remained negative in all final serum samples tested, and anti-chromatin positivity was detected in three other patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings have shown that anti-TNF therapy induced ANA positivity...
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Arthritis, Psoriatic/blood , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Autoantibodies/blood , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Avaliar as complicações imediatas da aplicação de agentes anti-TNFα no Centro de Dispensação de Medicação deAlto Custo do HC-FMUSP. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos todos os pacientes que receberam agentes anti-TNFα entre agosto/2007 e março/2009.As complicações imediatas (até 1 hora após o término da aplicação) foram classificadas em leves (cefaleia, rash, tontura, prurido, náuseas), moderadas (febre, urticária, palpitação, dor torácica, dispneia, variação da pressão arterial de 20 a 40 mmHg) ou graves (febre com calafrios, dispneia com sibilância, variação da pressão arterial > 40 mmHg). RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 242 pacientes: 94 (39 por cento) com artrite reumatoide, 64 (26 por cento) com espondilite anquilosante, 32 (13 por cento) com artrite psoriásica, 26 (11 por cento) com artrite idiopática juvenil e 27 (11 por cento) com outros diagnósticos. O número total de aplicações foi de 3.555, sendo 992 (28 por cento) de adalimumabe, 1.546 (43 por cento) de etanercepte e 1.017 (29 por cento) de infliximabe. Complicações imediatas foram observadas em 39/242 (16 por cento) pacientes. As complicações ocorreram em 45/3.555 (1,2 por cento) aplicações. Estas foram mais frequentes com infliximabe comparado com adalimumabe (3,7 por cento vs. 0,5 por cento, P < 0,0001), e com etanercepte (3,7 por cento vs. 0,25 por cento, P < 0,0001). As complicações foram: leves 14/45 (31 por cento), moderadas 21/45 (47 por cento) e graves 10/45 (22 por cento); ocorreram principalmente nos primeiros seis meses de tratamento (56 por cento) e nas aplicações endovenosas, predominantemente na primeira hora de infusão (76 por cento). CONCLUSÃO: As reações agudas, apesar de raras, são potencialmente graves e ocorrem principalmente nas primeiras aplicações tanto no uso de medicações endovenosas como de subcutâneas...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate complications of anti-TNFα drugs at the "Center for Dispensation of High Cost Medications" of HC-FMUSP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who received anti-TNFα agents between August 2007 and March 2009 were included in this study. Immediate complications (up to 1 hour after the injection) were classified as mild (headache, rash, dizziness, itching, nausea), moderate (fever, urticaria, palpitation, chest pain, dyspnea, blood pressure variations between 20 and 40 mmHg), or severe (fever with chills, dyspnea with wheezing, variations in blood pressure > 40 mmHg). RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two patients were evaluated: 94 (39 percent) with rheumatoid arthritis, 64 (26 percent) with ankylosing spondylitis, 32 (13 percent) with psoriatic arthritis, 26 (11 percent) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis; and 27 (11 percent) with other diagnoses. A total of 3,555 injections were administered: 992 (28 percent) adalimumab, 1,546 (43 percent) etanercept, and 1,017 (29 percent) infliximab. Immediate adverse events were observed in 39/242 (16 percent) patients. Injectionrelated complications were observed in 46/3,555 (1.2 percent) injections. They were more common with infliximab than adalimumab (3.7 percent vs. 0.5 percent, P < 0.0001) and etanercept (3.7 percent vs. 0.25 percent, P < 0.0001). Complications were classified as mild 14/45 (31 percent), moderate 21/45 (47 percent), and severe 10/45 (22 percent), and occurred mainly in the first six months of treatment (56 percent) and after intravenous injections, especially (76 percent) in the first hour. CONCLUSION: Although rare, acute reactions can be severe, being observed more commonly after the initial injections, both intravenous and subcutaneous...